Two cases before the Supreme Court this week challenge a pillar of how the internet is run. At the heart of both is whether platforms like YouTube and Twitter should be held liable for content their algorithms share with users.
WSJ legal affairs reporter Jan Wolfe joins host Zoe Thomas to discuss how the justices reacted to the arguments and what the outcome could mean for Big Tech.
0:00 Should Google and Twitter be held liable for promoting ISIS videos?
1:16 Why have these two Supreme Court cases not been combined?
2:27 What are the arguments against YouTube and Twitter?
4:30 Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas weighs in
6:30 Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan weighs in
8:05 What does this mean for big tech companies?
Tech News Briefing
WSJ’s tech podcast featuring breaking news, scoops and tips on tech innovations and policy debates, plus exclusive interviews with movers and shakers in the industry.
#YouTube #Twitter #WSJ
WSJ legal affairs reporter Jan Wolfe joins host Zoe Thomas to discuss how the justices reacted to the arguments and what the outcome could mean for Big Tech.
0:00 Should Google and Twitter be held liable for promoting ISIS videos?
1:16 Why have these two Supreme Court cases not been combined?
2:27 What are the arguments against YouTube and Twitter?
4:30 Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas weighs in
6:30 Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan weighs in
8:05 What does this mean for big tech companies?
Tech News Briefing
WSJ’s tech podcast featuring breaking news, scoops and tips on tech innovations and policy debates, plus exclusive interviews with movers and shakers in the industry.
#YouTube #Twitter #WSJ
- Category
- Television
- Tags
- youtube, twitter, algorithm
Sign in or sign up to post comments.
Be the first to comment