Write For Us

Affirmative Action vs. Race-Neutral Admissions: A Case Study | WSJ

Sponsored Post Vitamin D2 Canada Persia
86 Views

  • Thanks! Share it with your friends!

    You disliked this video. Thanks for the feedback!

ava
Published
The Supreme Court has banned colleges from using race as criteria for admissions. Essentially ending the 50-year run of affirmative action programs.

California banned public colleges like Berkeley and UCLA from using race in their admissions in the 1990s. Since then, a large study measuring the academic success and earnings of students before and after the ban has shown what effects “race-neutral” admissions policies have on minority students.

WSJ explains how affirmative action worked, why the Supreme Court struck it down — and what we can learn from California about how higher education might look without it.

0:00 Supreme Court bans affirmative action
1:00 Admissions before race considerations
3:06 How affirmative action worked
4:58 Lessons from California
7:02 Race-neutral policies

News Explainers
Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day's biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news.

#SCOTUS #AffirmativeAction #WSJ
Category
Television
Tags
affirmative action, scotus, scotus affirmative action
Sign in or sign up to post comments.
Be the first to comment